|
STOP-LOSS: HOW TO USE IT IN TRADING
Chapter Outline:
If you
like content on this page, please do share with your friends on Facebook:
Stop-loss is a widely used term in investment circles. As the name
says, it is a price level at which one should stop or limit his losses
in a position. Investing or trading is like gambling when one looks
at from the outcome perspective. When a person gambles or speculates,
he does not know what the outcome will be. He would hope the outcome
to be in his favor but it could very well go against him. The same thing
goes for investing or trading. When someone buys a stock, he might be
thinking, and to a great extent hoping, that the stock price would go
up, but it could very well go down. So what should a person do if the
prices go contrary to one's expectations? There are two alternatives: (i) He can continue to hold it believing,
and hoping, that it will ultimately go up; or (ii) He can blame the
unexpected mess on his wrong selection, bad judgment, bad timing or
on circumstances/development beyond his control or imagination, and…
get out of the position. It is a price level or a mechanism that forces a trader to take/book
losses in a losing position instead of letting them grow any bigger.
Ideally a Stop-loss level should be decided as soon as a trade is executed.
If a stock say ABC is bought at 25$, Stop-loss for it can be kept at
a price level somewhat lower than 25$. It can be 24, 23, 20 or even
15$. Let us assume the Stop-loss is kept at 20$. This means if the price
of ABC, after having bought at 25$, goes below 20$, one should close
the position by selling it. 5$ is the loss the buyer is limiting to.
This might be little confusing for novice traders because it involves
closing a position willingly at a loss! Remember: In a long position,
the Stop-loss level is usually lower than the entry price. Likewise if a person Shorts (what is this term? It means sell first
even if you don't own the stock with the hope to buy it back later at
a lower price) ABC stocks at 25$, he should keep a Stop-loss at any
price higher than 25$. Say if it was kept at 30$, this means if the
price moves up contrary to the initial expectations of it going down,
and touches 30$, one should call it a quit and square up the position.
Thus, in a short sell, the Stop-loss price is higher than the price
at which the stock was sold.
COST
AND BENEFIT OF USING STOP-LOSS The use of Stop-loss has its merits, and problems too. Let us take
two examples to illustrate cost and benefit of it. Let us assume someone bought a stock like, CMGI or ARBA, around 150$-level
during the Year 2000 boom period, thinking that it was a great company
(Believe me there were many investors who believed so at that time!).
And if he continued to hold to that position during its downtrend (hoping
that it would one day reach 200$!!!), he would have seen the stock price
drop to as low as 1$ in 2002! In this kind of situations, one would
wish if he had kept a Stop-loss and limited his losses to 5 or 10$ per
share! This makes a strong case for the use of Stop-loss. Now let us look at an opposite situation. Assume that the same person
had bought Yahoo at split adjusted 10$ in October 1997 and kept a Stop-loss
at 9$. Suppose the price went below 9$ and triggered his Stop-loss.
He would be out of Yahoo! Position at a 100$ loss! Then as time passed,
Yahoo kept climbing up and ultimately reached as high as 500$ in January
2000! An initial 1,000 $ investment could have been worth 50,000$ if
there were no Stop-loss were used! Should
A Trader Use Stop-loss? So a million dollar question is: Should you use Stop-loss or not? Answer
is that it depends. If you are an investor with purely long-term perspectives
and with a diversified portfolio, you should probably not. As the saying goes, there is no free lunch in financial markets. So
the use of a Stop-loss has its benefits and problems. In a few paragraphs
below, I will try to show you how to get the maximum out of this Stop-loss
and how to use it in your favor. Let us go back to the above two scenarios
one more time. Let us assume that that 1000$ position in Yahoo at 10$ price had no
Stop-loss. Do you think the buyer would have continued to hold onto
it until it touched 500$? It is very likely he might be out before it
even doubled or tripled! I think most of the investors including myself
would be pretty satisfied to have doubled or tripled our investment
over a short period. Let us assume our buyer of Yahoo in this example
is made of different material. Suppose he had guts to hold on to a winning
stock and he watched Yahoo go up to 20, 50, 100, 150, 300$ level. I
am curious to know what would have prompted him to sell Yahoo around
that 400/500$ level. It is possible that his patience and guts may have
glued him to that Yahoo position, even when the YHOO stock reversed
its trend and price touched 10$ level back sometimes in 2002. This is
an extreme example and I have mentioned it to highlight two things:
Most of the investors get satisfied with small profits, and a new type
of Stop-loss- Progressive Stop-loss that we will discuss later
in this chapter. What in the case of CMGI or ARBA? It is very likely that individuals
who usually take small profits might have stayed in such losing positions
all the way to zero! My point is: Most individuals play stock market
like a D or F-grade student! When it comes to booking profit, they get
easily satisfied with a few points of profit but when it is a loss situation
loss, they are likely to hold on and stick to the stock too long. Most
investors are more risk-averse (they hate the risk of profit going down)
in the profit zone and less risk-averse (they tend to take a lot of
risk in the hope that prices will go up someday) when in a loss zone.
This asymmetrical behavior is typical for most investors. What is the
end result? Small profits but big losses!!!! This is the reason I advise
most traders to use stop-loss when they are trading stocks or Futures. It is very much feasible that (small) profits in ten positions can
easily be wiped out by two/three big losses! So even if a trader has
70 to 80% success rate in stock selection, we would hardly break if
he does not stop his losses! I think this is one of the main reasons
why our trading results in losses most, if not all, of the time! I think
this makes a solid case for every trader to understand and learn to
use a Stop-loss on every trading position. HOW
TO EFFECTIVELY USE STOP-LOSS Almost every person loves to take profit but if things go contrary
to his expectations, he must also use a Stop-loss to limit his losses.
Question is how much loss is enough? There is no clear answer to this
question that will suit every trader's needs and circumstances. If one
does not want to lose a great deal, he should keep the Stop-loss close
to his trade price. The benefit is a small loss. However this would
increase the probability of the Stop-loss being triggered. So the result
is small but frequent losses. On the other hand, if a trader does not
want his Stop-loss levels to be frequently triggered, he should keep
more distance between his entry price and the Stop-loss. This will result
in less frequent but higher losses. So how much loss is ideal? It is
really an individual's decision based on his risk-tolerance, asset base,
trading system, return objective in the position, market conditions
and the nature of the stock itself. So how much
is enough? What should
be a base/price level to calculate our stop-loss? Let us assume that
5% is the ideal Stop-loss or safe distance percentage for a given position.
Now another question is what level one should use to calculate his Stop-loss
price. If he buys this stock at 50$, the most obvious choice is to use
the 50$ level and go for a safe distance of 5%. This will be 47.50$.
This is the most widely used approach to determine Stop-loss levels-
to use the purchase price as the base price. However John Magee
in his classic book on Technical Analysis of Stock Trends (a
must-read for chart reading investors) suggests using Minor Tops
and Minor Bottoms as base points. It makes a lot of sense. An individual's
purchase price has no meaning in the universe of constantly fluctuating
stock prices but Minor Bottom/Minor Top is a somewhat significant price
level. Minor bottom is the price point where at least for some time
buyers were more aggressive than sellers and were able to push prices
higher. Minor bottom means buyers' gained more strength to outbid selling
pressure. Similarly a Minor Top the recent high price. It is the price
at which the stock attracted more selling. How to decide
a minor bottom? It is tricky and
subjective. Different people can have different methods or parameters
to find Minor Tops and Bottoms. Here also, I like John Magee's definition.
Let me try to explain
a Minor Bottom:
The same thing can be applied in reverse for calculating a Minor Top.
Read this again and again until you comfortably understand it. Thus
for best results, one should use the Minor Top or Bottom as his basis
to calculate Stop-loss level for his position. This is likely to provide
better protection than the stop-loss calculated based on his entry/trade
price. Stop-loss is mostly referred to a loss situation. This should not be
the case. Stop-loss can also be used to a trader's advantage in a profitable
trade when prices are moving the direction he wanted them to. A Protective
Stop-loss level can be changed in the direction of the stock price.
If one has taken a long position and the prices are going up, he can
increase his stop-loss level. This makes it a Progressive Stop-loss.
(The word "Stop-loss" word becomes deceptive in this context. Instead
of relating to a loss, it is used to protect a profit). Let me explain a Progressive Stop-loss in more details. Let us continue
our example above. Assume that the trader bought the stock at 50$ after
a Minor Bottom was confirmed at 45$, and kept a stop-loss with 5% distance
which is 42.75$. This is the initial
Protective Stop-loss. Assume that the stock price goes up and touches 55$ and then enters
into a reaction and slides back to 50$. The day it touches 50$, the
high was 52$. Now again the price seems to be going up and there were
three consecutive days on which stock traded above 52$. This will confirm
a higher Minor Bottom at 50$! Now he can raise Stop-loss to 47.5$ (50$
minus 5%) from initial level or 42.75%. Assume that the stock resumes it up-trend and makes a higher Top at
65$. Then it slides back to as low as 58$ and passes the 3-day test
of a Minor Bottom. So now one can raise his Stop-loss to 55$ (58$ minus
5%). This trading position is in profit now and profit is also sort
of guaranteed! Say the upward trend in prices of this stock continues.
It touches a price as high as 85$. Subsequently let us say a Minor Bottom
is confirmed as per our three consecutive days test at 78$. So the new
Stop-loss level is now at 74$ (78 minus 5%). Now let us assume that after the last Top and Bottom being confirmed
at 85$ and 78$ respectively, the stock fails to go higher than 85$.
This is an indication of some weakness. Now when it starts going below
78$ (the last Minor Bottom), one should get worried. Still there is
no need to sell the position because the stop-loss is 5% below the last
Minor Bottom. This helps us if the stock is forming a mid-trend pattern
like flag or pennant. If after going as low as 75$, the stock resumes
its upward trend and goes above 85$, one is still in the game! However
if it does not go higher and instead goes below 74$ (current Stop-loss
level), one should close the position. As you can see, even if the stop-loss
triggered, the position had a profit of 24$ (Sell price 74$ versus purchase
price of 50$) per share!
Now is the time to look at some trading signals. Click here to look at U-TURN signal. |
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This trading system/signal, like any other system, may fail at times. Exercise caution when trading and decide suitability of any trade by taking into consideration market conditions, your financial situation, investment objectives and circumstances. Always keep a stop-loss when you are trading. All
content on this website and the ProfitFromPrices eBook are copyrighted
material |